000 | 03651cam a22004578i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 20578008 | ||
003 | KPN | ||
005 | 20211122160448.0 | ||
008 | 180629s2019 nyu b 000 0 eng c | ||
010 | _a 2018018217 | ||
020 |
_a9780815381860 _q(paperback) |
||
020 |
_a9780815383802 _q(hardback) |
||
020 |
_z9781351209434 _q(ebk) |
||
020 |
_z9781351209410 _qebook |
||
040 |
_aLBSOR/DLC _beng _erda _cLBSOR |
||
042 | _apcc | ||
043 | _an-us--- | ||
050 | 0 | 0 |
_aJA85.2.U6 _bD54 2019 |
082 | 0 | 0 |
_a320.97301/4 _223 |
245 | 0 | 0 |
_aDigital discussions : _bhow big data informs political communication / _cedited by Natalie Jomini Stroud and Shannon C McGregor. |
263 | _a1810 | ||
264 | 1 |
_aNew York : _bRoutledge, Taylor & Francis Group, _c2019. |
|
300 | _ax, 200 pages | ||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier |
||
490 | 0 | _aNew agendas in communication | |
500 | _aincludes index | ||
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references. | ||
505 | 0 | _aBig data in political communication / Natalie Jomini Stroud & Shannon Mcgregor -- Normalizing digital trace data / Andreas Jungherr -- Everything old is new again: big data and methodological transparency / Leticia Bode -- Ignorance or uncertainty: how the "black box" dilemma in big data research may "misinform" political communication / Lei Guo -- Why don't tweets consistently track elections? lessons from linking twitter and survey data streams / Josh Pasek and Jake Dailey -- Inferring individual-level characteristics from digital trace data: issues and recommendations / Deen Freelon -- The technical, the personal, and the political: understanding journalists and news users' engagement in the New York Times comments section / Ashley muddiman -- Is Yik Yak a platform for political communication? exploring college students: communication on an emergent social media platform / Chris Vargo and Toby Hopp -- Data-driven campaigning / Jesse Baldwin-Philippi -- "Little Marco," "lyin' Ted," "crooked Hillary," and the "biased" media: how Trump used Twitter to attack and organize / Ayellet Pelled, Josephine Lukito, Fred Boehm, Janghwan Yang, and Dhavan Shah. | |
520 |
_a"Big data raise major research possibilities for political communication scholars interested in how citizens, elites, and journalists interact. With the availability of social media data, academics can observe, on a large scale, how people talk about politics. The opportunity to study political discussions also is available to media organizations and political elites; examining how they make use of big data represents another fruitful scholarly trajectory. The scholars involved in Digital Discussions represent forward thinkers who aim to inform the study of political communication by analyzing the behavior of and messages left by citizens, elites, and journalists in digital spaces. Using a variety of methodological approaches and bringing diverse theoretical perspectives, this group sheds light on how big data can inform political communication research. It is critical reading for those studying and working in communication studies with a focus on big data"-- _cProvided by publisher. |
||
546 | _aIn english | ||
650 | 0 |
_aCommunication in politics _xTechnological innovations _zUnited States. |
|
650 | 0 |
_aBig data _xPolitical aspects _zUnited States. |
|
650 | 0 |
_aBig data _xSocial aspects _zUnited States. |
|
700 | 1 |
_aStroud, Natalie Jomini, _eeditor. |
|
700 | 1 |
_aMcGregor, Shannon C., _eeditor. |
|
906 |
_a7 _bcbc _corignew _d1 _eecip _f20 _gy-gencatlg |
||
942 |
_2ddc _c1 _n0 |
||
999 |
_c405 _d405 |